<p style="text-align: right;"><em><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Season&#039;s Beatings" href="#" target="_blank">Season&#039;s Beatings</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> | Art by <a href="https://scryfall.com/search?q=artist%3Akevwalker&amp;unique=cards&amp;as=grid&amp;order=name" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kev Walker</a></em></p>
<h2>Seasons Greetings!</h2>
<p>This week, we're going back in time and covering everything that came out for <em>Universes Beyond! </em>Here, we'll be giving an in-depth review for each of the major releases this year (<em>Secret Lairs</em> get their own section). This'll be a long article, so let's save my word count, and <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Commence the Endgame" href="#" target="_blank">Commence the Endgame</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>!</p>
<hr />
<h2>Release #1: <em>Final Fantasy</em></h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Vivi Ornitier"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Rinoa Heartilly"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER"></div></div>
<p>For this year, we begin with a bang so loud it could be heard across the world. The <em>Final Fantasy</em> set took the community by storm, becoming the <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/final-fantasy-best-selling-mtg-set-before-official-release-date">fastest-selling set before it was even released</a>!</p>
<p>In addition, this set had something for everyone. Commander, as a whole, got plenty of goodies from the main set, to the bonus sheet, to the <em>Secret Lairs</em> (more on those in that section). I even set out to write an article featuring only cards from this release, which you can read about <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/beyond-the-multiverse-the-final-fantasy-sendoff">here</a>. Many cards, including the new additions from the precons, are still being played in the format.</p>
<p>Even though he's banned in Standard, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Vivi Ornitier" href="#" target="_blank">Vivi Ornitier</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is still sending chills down the spines of players everywhere. Meanwhile, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER" href="#" target="_blank">Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is perhaps the most powerful <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Blood Artist" href="#" target="_blank">Blood Artist</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> effect ever printed, and on a commander option no less.</p>
<p>However, I can't say this was all a bed of roses. The set had a higher power level than usual, including Vivi, who has traumatized Standard players everywhere, and thus may react when we use a deck for him.</p>
<p>Speaking of Standard, this set was the first in the <em>Universes Beyond</em> product line to be Standard legal, a decision I don't endorse. Maybe the next set will be better, no?</p>
<hr />
<h2>Release #2: <em>Spider-Man</em></h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="The Soul Stone"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Parker Luck"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Cosmic Spider-Man"></div></div>
<p>...Okay, maybe not.</p>
<p>This set was met with quite the negative reception. Sure, this release drew in some people, but even I admit that this was the worst <em>Universes Beyond</em> set this year. This is true especially when we compare it to the other releases.</p>
<p>The highlight card is <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="The Soul Stone" href="#" target="_blank">The Soul Stone</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, a card with Commander usage, and some long-term implications. Many were quick to point out a new plane in the Multiverse, named New York City (this is a joke, by the way). While I could go on about how it was received, it's not to say its Commander applications were useless.</p>
<p>Aside from The Soul Stone, we got our mitts on some tri-color commanders, like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Gwen Stacy" href="#" target="_blank">Gwen Stacy</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and a five-color option in <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Cosmic Spider-Man" href="#" target="_blank">Cosmic Spider-Man</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>. If you asked me what I did with this set, I'd tell you nothing, but I did plan on making Cosmic Spider-Man with cards mostly from this set. We also got a lot of new Spider support, including <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Mary Jane Watson" href="#" target="_blank">Mary Jane Watson</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, who's certainly going on a date with <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Shelob, Child of Ungoliant" href="#" target="_blank">Shelob, Child of Ungoliant</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>...Wait a minute. Nah, it's probably nothing.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Release #3: <em>Avatar: The Last Airbender (ATLA)</em></h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Ozai, the Phoenix King"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Avatar Aang"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Fire Lord Azula"></div></div>
<p>To out my thoughts shortly: <em>Spider-Man</em> walked, so <em>ATLA</em> could run.</p>
<p>There's no mistaking it. People were excited for this set, and for good reason. While we did get yet another five-color option in <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Avatar Aang" href="#" target="_blank">Avatar Aang</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, his design was actually more creative than what we got with Cosmic Spider-Man.</p>
<p>Plus, we also got as plethora of unique and interesting two and three-color commander choices. One of the most popular of these is <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Fire Lord Azula" href="#" target="_blank">Fire Lord Azula</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, who'll be copying spells left and right. Meanwhile, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Fire Lord Zuko" href="#" target="_blank">Fire Lord Zuko</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is another take on an exile deck that'll give <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Prosper, Tome-Bound" href="#" target="_blank">Prosper, Tome-Bound</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> decks a new color.</p>
<p>The heavy presence of Ally cards really bolstered the creature type, even giving it a couple of new commanders in <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Katara, the Fearless" href="#" target="_blank">Katara, the Fearless</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> and <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Sokka, Tenacious Tactician" href="#" target="_blank">Sokka, Tenacious Tactician</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>. <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="General Tazri" href="#" target="_blank">General Tazri</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> decks will never be the same again, I assure you.</p>
<p>While this set wasn't on the same power level as <em>Final Fantasy</em>, the flavor and unique mechanics makes it a major competitor for <em>Universes Beyond</em> Set of the Year.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Bonus: The Secret Lair Drops</h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Jodah, the Unifier|sld|1932"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Sonic the Hedgehog"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Kratos, God of War"></div></div>
<p>To wrap up this review, we have ourselves a myriad of Secret Lair Drops that gave us some new IPs to work with.</p>
<p>Kicking this off was <em>Marvel,</em> again. This time, with <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Deadpool, Trading Card" href="#" target="_blank">Deadpool, Trading Card</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>. Great card, if you want to give judges a headache.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Deadpool, Trading Card"></div></div>
<p>Secondly, the <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/beyond-the-multiverse-whos-that-under-the-sea-spongebob-squarepants"><em>SpongeBob SquarePants</em> Superdrop</a>, which brought us reskins of existing cards. Nothing too special about these drops beyond that, unless you were lucky enough to pull a <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Smothering Tithe|sld|7009" href="#" target="_blank">Smothering Tithe</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>Next, we had the aforementioned <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/secret-lair-x-final-fantasy-three-new-drops-revealed"><em>Final Fantasy</em> drops</a>, which were jam-packed with strong reprints to go with the main release. On a personal note, I remember this release destroying my mental health so badly that it took me months to recover (There's a part of me that hasn't).</p>
<p>Later in the year, we got the next batch of drops <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/secret-lair-x-sonic-three-new-drops-officially-announced">in the form of the <em>Sonic the Hedgehog</em> franchise</a>. These featured mechanically unique legends in one of the drops, while the rest were reskins of existing cards. There was chatter about <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Shadow the Hedgehog" href="#" target="_blank">Shadow the Hedgehog</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> making waves in higher brackets, but I don't know if that's still true.</p>
<p>After that was a <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/secret-lair-drops-for-spider-man-release-on-september-22nd">Superdrop themed around <em>Spider-Man</em></a>, but I remember the Venom-related drops being the most prominent of the lot.</p>
<p>Next, we had a big surge in IPs, <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/big-reveals-at-the-secret-lair-panel-at-magiccon-atlanta">from <em>The Office</em> to various <em>PlayStation</em> games</a> and, eventually, to <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/secret-lair-webstore-hints-at-monster-hunter-drops"><em>Monster Hunter</em></a>. The <em>PlayStation </em>ones were all mechanically unique with several interesting new commanders. In the midst of it all was the <em>ATLA </em>superdrop, which featured <em>ATLA</em>-themed reprints for those wanting to play with the IP.</p>
<p>...Whew. That was a long list.</p>
<hr />
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Ziatora, the Incinerator|SLD|2238"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Joel, Resolute Survivor|SLD|2198"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Reaper King|SLD|2170"></div></div>
<h2>Ride Unto a New Dawn</h2>
<p>And that's a wrap for this year's <em>Universes Beyond</em> releases.</p>
<p>With next year featuring four sets, plus loads of <em>Secret Lair </em>drops, it'll be interesting to see if I can contain it in one article.</p>
<p>Originally, this week was supposed to be for a deck tech, but a hiccup in the scheduling has moved it into next year. This is better for me, because it meant that I can avoid the awkward situation of ruining my advent calendar to write up my articles, especially in the middle of the month. Good thing I got a second box for this purpose.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, tune in next time where I explain the rules of my shenanigans, and kick off the festivities.</p>
<h3>Read More:</h3>
<p>https://edhrec.com/articles/fire-lord-zuko-commander-deck-tech</p>
<p>https://edhrec.com/articles/beyond-the-multiverse-guru-pathik</p>
<p>https://edhrec.com/articles/the-best-commander-from-every-year-of-the-2000s</p>


2025: The Year in Universes Beyond

Top 10 Universal Pump Effects for Ellie, Brick Master and Joel, Resolute Survivor

<p style="text-align: right;"><em><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Michelangelo, the Heart" href="#" target="_blank">Michelangelo, the Heart</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> | Art by <a href="https://www.artstation.com/nezt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Néstor Ossandón Leal</a></em></p>
<p>Hi, I'm <a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/author/michael-celani" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Michael Celani</a>, and I think typed partners are stupid. Let me explain.</p>
<p>Recently, <em>Secret Lair x PlayStation </em>introduced <em>typed partner sets</em> to <em>Magic</em>, which is a mechanical update to to the partner keyword that lets the designers enforce more granular restrictions on which legendary creatures can share the command zone. Now, you may designate up to two legendary creatures with partner as your commanders <em>as long as</em> each you've selected share the same partner designator.<span id='easy-footnote-1-166993' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://edhrec.com/articles/no-typed-partners-are-not-good-for-commander/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-166993' title='Commanders printed before this update and lacking a partner designator in their rules text still share their own typed partner set; it&#039;s just the unnamed, original, and largest one.'><sup>1</sup></a></span></p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Joel, Resolute Survivor"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Atreus, Impulsive Son"></div></div>
<p>As an example, the characters from <em>The Last of Us </em>are <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Joel, Resolute Survivor" href="#" target="_blank">Survivors</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and thus can only partner up with other characters from <em>The Last of Us</em>, while the two characters from the <em>God of War</em> Secret Lair are <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Atreus, Impulsive Son" href="#" target="_blank">Father &amp; son</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> and can only partner up with each other.</p>
<p>You can't mix the two groups up, no matter how badly you want to canonize your fanfiction.</p>
<h2>What's Old is New Again</h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Wernog, Rider&#039;s Chaplain"></div></div>
<p>On the surface, this is a smart, precise change that allows Wizards to manage subsets of legal commander pairings without having to nanny the Comprehensive Rules. In practical gameplay terms, this update means <em>nothing</em>. <em>Magic</em>'s done typed partner sets for <em>years;</em> it's just that, until now, they've always been called something else. They've never <em>truly</em> been the real deal.</p>
<p><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Wernog, Rider&#039;s Chaplain|SLD|347" href="#" target="_blank">Friends forever</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is to civil unions as partner is to marriage, which is why <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Akroma, Vision of Ixidor" href="#" target="_blank">Akroma</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is confirmed the most homophobic commander.</p>
<p>Sure, there have been slight mechanical quibbles in the past that might have <em>in theory</em> warranted new keywords, but <em>all</em> of them amounted to solving the problem of enabling legal commander pairings from among two <em>disjointed </em>sets of cards — whether that be choosing a Background or finding the doctor a companion.<span id='easy-footnote-2-166993' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://edhrec.com/articles/no-typed-partners-are-not-good-for-commander/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-166993' title='&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;I don&#039;t even think that hurdle would be insurmountable with a more specific implementation of partner typing. It&#039;s just finding the right way to represent it on the card that&#039;s tricky.'><sup>2</sup></a></span></span></p>
<p>Even partner <em>with</em> is an example of typed partner sets; there may only be two options available, but a small set is still a set, dammit.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Where They Came From</h2>
<p>But why bother restricting partners in this manner at all? Well, it all starts back at the beginning, with a little set called <em><a href="https://edhrec.com/sets/c16" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Commander 2016</a>.</em></p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Reyhan, Last of the Abzan"></div></div>
<p><em>Commander 2016 </em>hit the shelves running with a series of five unique face commanders: <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder" href="#" target="_blank">Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Saskia the Unyielding" href="#" target="_blank">Saskia the Unyielding</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis" href="#" target="_blank">Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Breya, Etherium Shaper" href="#" target="_blank">Breya, Etherium Shaper</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Atraxa, Praetors&#039; Voice" href="#" target="_blank">Atraxa, Praetors&#039; Voice</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>At this point in time, four-color commander decks weren't just rare, they were <em>impossible</em> to build. There simply weren't any legendary creatures in the game that had <em>almost</em> every color available to them; they all either capped out at three colors or pushed for the full five.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Kraum, Ludevic&#039;s Opus"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker"></div></div>
<p>The problem with introducing four-color legendary creatures in a commander set is that Commander decks have backup commanders, and creating <em>two </em>such cards with strangely specific color identities per deck <em>without</em> making them feel similar to one another is difficult.</p>
<p>Instead, Wizards created the original partners. They were all two colors, so you could mix and match them to create a variety of color identities.</p>
<p>This decision is notable for being exclusively maligned.</p>
<h2>Why the Original Partners Were Busted</h2>
<p>It's easy to point to the partner mechanic itself as a problem, and when it came to the <em>Commander 2016</em> set, that's what people did. You could start a game with eight cards! You could build almost any color identity you want! Four-color generic good-stuff decks abound!</p>
<p>These reasons all contribute, sure, but they're a scapegoat distracting from the true issue. No, the actual problem with the original partners was that all of them were too powerful on the face of it.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Thrasios, Triton Hero"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Tymna the Weaver"></div></div>
<p><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Thrasios, Triton Hero" href="#" target="_blank">Thrasios, Triton Hero</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is absurdly busted on its own, to the point that the fact that you could add a <em>second</em> commander to your deck almost doesn't matter. A simple test to apply to these original partners is: "If they didn't have partner, would they still be playable as a standalone general?" If the answer is yes, it probably shouldn't have partner, and <em>far</em> too many of the original fifteen fail this test.</p>
<p>In fact, for Thrasios in particular, Wizards tried that: version 2.0 is named <a href="https://commandersherald.com/breaking-new-simic-commander-lets-you-draw-a-card-and-play-an-extra-land/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><del>literally all of Simic</del></a> <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Gretchen Titchwillow" href="#" target="_blank">Gretchen Titchwillow</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and even <em>after</em> removing partner they <em>still</em> found the need to nerf the activated ability by adding color requirements.</p>
<hr />
<h2>A Problem That Didn't Exist</h2>
<p>Wizards overcorrected for the partner problem in the wrong way multiple times. First, by simply not touching the damn thing. They didn't revisit partner until 2018. When they did, their second mistake was that partner with limited commanders to specific pairs instead of adding to the general population, and I <em>hate </em>this decision.<span id='easy-footnote-3-166993' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://edhrec.com/articles/no-typed-partners-are-not-good-for-commander/#easy-footnote-bottom-3-166993' title='You might argue that partner with was actually designed as a limited mechanic for Battlebond, since playing one searches up the other from a target player&#039;s deck. This is true, but if they didn&#039;t want it to affect Commander, they could have named the mechanic something literally anything other than partner with and locked them out from sharing the command zone.'><sup>3</sup></a></span></p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Gorm the Great"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Virtus the Veiled"></div></div>
<p>Just like how people blamed partner for the power of the <em>Commander 2016</em> commanders, people praised partner with for the benign nature of the <em>Battlebond </em>commanders (and all subsequent partner with commanders since). The <em>actual</em> reason they work is that Wizards, in general, intentionally made the partner with commanders less powerful to compensate for the additional card in the command zone.</p>
<p>Frankly, that's what they <em>should have</em> done in the first place.<span id='easy-footnote-4-166993' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://edhrec.com/articles/no-typed-partners-are-not-good-for-commander/#easy-footnote-bottom-4-166993' title='This is actually the problem with eminence, too. If they provided simpler benefits, or a sidegrade to regular play instead of straight buffs, it would have been fine.'><sup>4</sup></a></span></p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Alisaie Leveilleur"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Alphinaud Leveilleur"></div></div>
<p>Take a look at <a href="https://scryfall.com/search?q=o%3A%22partner+with%22+is%3Acommander&amp;unique=cards&amp;as=grid&amp;order=name" target="_blank" rel="noopener">all of the partner with commanders</a> printed since <em>Battlebond</em>. How many of them become a bigger issue than they already are if they were added into the general partner population? By my count, only three: <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Pako, Arcane Retriever" href="#" target="_blank">Pako</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Will Kenrith" href="#" target="_blank">Will</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Ukkima, Stalking Shadow" href="#" target="_blank">Ukkima</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>Many of these commanders could have been released into the general partner population with no problems whatsoever. You're just taking away customization for no real reason.</p>
<hr />
<h2>The Way Forward</h2>
<p>So why does this matter? I think Wizards should seriously consider using fewer typed partner sets going forward. They have their place, sure, but limiting player choice in this way doesn't <em>have</em> to be a safety valve they install every single time.</p>
<p>Be more adventurous with the original partner group! The context of each release should naturally guide casual players to the intended partner pairings, while allowing more experienced players to experiment with their own builds. As evidence, consider that Wizards eventually revisited the original partner mechanic in <em>Commander Legends</em> and added tons of new commanders to be used alongside the original <em>Commander 2016</em> designs — and, a few misfires aside, it was fine.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Sakashima of a Thousand Faces"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Krark, the Thumbless"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Kodama of the East Tree"></div></div>
<p>Partner can be a fun way to create unique decks with fun play patterns. Simply keep the power level low in each individual commander. Even if you accidentally slip up and create a two-card combo in the command zone, players can solve that problem with social interaction and <a href="https://edhrec.com/guides/edhrec-guide-to-commander-brackets" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the Bracket system</a>.</p>
<p>If I don't get to play SpongeBob alongside <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Owen Grady, Raptor Trainer" href="#" target="_blank">Owen Grady, Raptor Trainer</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> in the near future, I will be very sad.</p>
<h3>Read More:</h3>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="c4hiPfJw1b"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/kratos-and-atreus-commander-deck-tech/">Kratos and Atreus Commander Deck Tech</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;Kratos and Atreus Commander Deck Tech&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/kratos-and-atreus-commander-deck-tech/embed/#?secret=kvqdMQx7oZ#?secret=c4hiPfJw1b" data-secret="c4hiPfJw1b" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="7frdp6dPNL"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/new-york-comic-con-2025-magic-the-gathering-panel-recap/">New York Comic Con 2025 Magic: The Gathering Panel Recap</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;New York Comic Con 2025 Magic: The Gathering Panel Recap&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/new-york-comic-con-2025-magic-the-gathering-panel-recap/embed/#?secret=mhD8tukMGA#?secret=7frdp6dPNL" data-secret="7frdp6dPNL" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="iaeY3fk7sP"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/a-new-way-to-voltron-with-nikara-and-yannik/">A New Way to Voltron, With Nikara and Yannik</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;A New Way to Voltron, With Nikara and Yannik&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/a-new-way-to-voltron-with-nikara-and-yannik/embed/#?secret=RBRT1vAXRC#?secret=iaeY3fk7sP" data-secret="iaeY3fk7sP" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>


playstation secret lair

2025: The Year in Universes Beyond

Top 10 Universal Pump Effects for Ellie, Brick Master and Joel, Resolute Survivor

No, Typed Partners Are Not Good For Commander