<div class="d-flex flex-column gap-2">
<p style="text-align: right;"><em><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Weathered Wayfarer|2x2|578" href="#" target="_blank">Weathered Wayfarer</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> | Art by <a href="https://dermotpower.com/wizards-of-the-coast" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dermont Power</a></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lands. The single most prominent card type found in every <em>Magic</em> deck that has ever existed. Despite newer cards pushing the power level higher and higher every set, lands seem to be the one spot everyone knows to not push too much.</p>
</div>
<div class="ArticlePage_content__j0Z44 wp-content" data-content-ads-inserted="true" data-slot-rendered-content="invalid">
<p>Odds are our mana bases haven't changed too much since... well, forever ago. The last time I remember actively searching for new lands for Commander was during Ikoria's release and I was hunting each Triome, despite not having a deck for any of them to call home.</p>
<p>Most recently, players would be cracking packs for the new <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Commercial District" href="#" target="_blank">surveil lands</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, but these are just a strict upgrade over Theros's <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Temple of Malady" href="#" target="_blank">Temples</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, as opposed to Ikoria's five Triomes being completely new.</p>
<p>It seems nowadays that any deck can secure its colors reliably without mana rocks to compensate. There are enough <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Indatha Triome" href="#" target="_blank">Triomes</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Evolving Wilds" href="#" target="_blank">Evolving Wilds</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Fabled Passage" href="#" target="_blank">Fabled Passage</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>s, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Prismatic Vista" href="#" target="_blank">Prismatic Vista</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>s, and other cheap <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Riveteers Overlook" href="#" target="_blank">fetch lands</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> for any and every deck to have reliable access to all five colors at any given moment.</p>
<p>So what does this mean? Weren't precons specifically designed with poor mana bases in mind? Should players be constrained by mana fixing in order to create a more social environment? Are the Brackets asking players to specifically cut lands to "be legal" for a given Bracket?</p>
<h2>Mana Bases Are Bracketless</h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Badlands"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Bayou"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Plateau"></div></div>
<p>Your mana base is everything that can generate you mana reliably; <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Arcane Signet" href="#" target="_blank">rocks</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Llanowar Elves" href="#" target="_blank">dorks</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Seething Song" href="#" target="_blank">rituals</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, and lands are all what form this base to build your game around. For this discussion, we'll be highlighting the lands portion of the mana base, but the points found here can be generalized for the other portions as well.</p>
<p>Gavin Verhey of <em>Wizards of the Coast</em> and the Commander Format Panel has detailed this a few different times, but ultimately the CFP's stance is this: A Bracket 5 deck's lands are perfectly OK for a Bracket 1 game.</p>
<p>Essentially, the lands that form the mana bases most commonly found in Bracket 5 aren't considered to belong to Bracket 5. The Brackets aren't aiming to place an arbitrary restriction on someone's lands as to artificially create a weaker deck.</p>
<p>There is no fundamental reason why a Bracket 2 deck couldn't run all five dual lands if able. The lands themselves are just a means for a player to play the game. <em>How</em> they use the mana their <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Volcanic Island" href="#" target="_blank">Volcanic Island</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> generates is what regulates which Bracket they should play in.</p>
<p>Yes, Bracket 2 decks have been compared to being as powerful as Commander precons. Yes, WoTC's precons historically have had fairly lackluster lands. It makes sense that Bracket 2 decks being portrayed as precons gives players the impression "if it's not in a precon, I shouldn't play it."</p>
<p>But this is a very vague description of what makes something Bracket 2-friendly. Not only is it hard for players to compare their decks to any one precon, but not every precon is equal to one another. I couldn't count how many recent precons <a href="https://edhrec.com/precon#warhammer40,000commander" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the <em>Warhammer</em> decks</a> would breeze over.</p>
<p>Additionally, Commander precons' mana bases take into consideration the secondary market and whether or not WoTC is willing to reprint certain cards for financial purposes. Precons' poor mana bases have more to do with WoTC's business model and less to do with what a precon can handle.</p>
<p>It's more than okay for your Bracket 2 deck to run whatever lands you feel are necessary to secure your mana base. Issues begin to arise when your lands start doing other things - things more powerful than just producing mana (and free mana is pretty hard to beat).</p>
<h2>That's No Mountain...</h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Cabal Coffers"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Urza&#039;s Saga"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle"></div></div>
<p>Aside from the <a href="https://edhrec.com/top/game-changers" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Game Changing</a> lands, there are plenty of ways your lands could be viewed as too much for Bracket 2. While running a <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Boseiju, Who Endures" href="#" target="_blank">Boseiju, Who Endures</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> isn't hurting anyone, and a stray <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Inventors&#039; Fair" href="#" target="_blank">Inventors&#039; Fair</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> helps with consistency, repeating these effects excessively or otherwise further exploiting similarly powerful lands can be what breaks the Bracket barrier.</p>
<p>Players engaging in a Bracket 2 game come to the table assuming that their opponents are looking for a game focused more on the social aspects of Commander that often finish with flashy and dramatic ways. As long as your mana base reflects this, there's no harm in running only the most efficient lands possible.</p>
<p>The big distinction here is what do you <em>intend</em> to do. If you intend to build a Bracket 2 deck, chances are your deck is already 90% of the way to becoming a Bracket 2 deck.</p>
<p>Do you intend to run <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Cabal Coffers" href="#" target="_blank">Cabal Coffers</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> alongside <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth" href="#" target="_blank">Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> specifically to resolve some game-winning X spell early? Probably not Bracket 2 safe. Do you intend to run Cabal Coffers alongside Urborg because you're playing a mono-black Zombie kindred deck and would like your lands to be more than just 37 swamps? Probably ok.</p>
<p>The hard part is realizing when you've transitioned from, say, upgrading basic lands to shocklands and instead begin actively optimizing which nonbasic lands can outright lead to a game ending, such as with the Coffers + Urborg example.</p>
<p>Is your <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Urza&#039;s Saga" href="#" target="_blank">Urza&#039;s Saga</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> going to tutor for something valuable or something that threatens victory? Does your <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle" href="#" target="_blank">Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> seek to immediately threaten lethal, if not victory, or does it simply fit into you mono-red Goblins deck?</p>
<p>The lands themselves are often not the problem. As long as any given land doesn't border Game Changer status, there's no unilateral reason for it to be excluded from a particular Bracket for this reason alone.</p>
<h2>The Lands Aren't the Problem — Your Deck Is</h2>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Simic Growth Chamber"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Kodama of the East Tree"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Meloku the Clouded Mirror"></div></div>
<p>Any given Bracket 2 Commander deck shouldn't be concerned with trying to find the amorphous Bracket barrier. If this is what your deck is doing, you've already lost the point.</p>
<p>The Brackets are to be a set of tools, guidelines that direct deckbuilding and game play in a desired direction. These tools can be used for better or worse, and actively stress-testing these tools at the expense of your opponents is for the worse.</p>
<p>For example, let's say someone seeks to build their first ever Commander deck for Bracket 2. They don't have an established play group, which is precisely what the Bracket system aims to help with.</p>
<p>They've reviewed all of the relevant Bracket descriptions and Game Changers and are left with what lands to play.</p>
<p>In theory, they would never encounter a problem with their lands being considered outside the scope of Bracket 2 since, as a new Commander player, they aren't familiar with fully optimizing their lands to act as more than just lands.</p>
<p>They've built the deck with the expressed intent of learning <em>Magic</em> through a different format and are ready to have Commander impress upon them a whole slew of perspectives.</p>
<p>Once they've played for long enough and have learned the faults with their first deck, they may seek to upgrade the deck to better challenge their opponents. At this point, it's possible this player has an established play group, at which point the Bracket system has completed it's function and is no longer required.</p>
<p>But let's say this isn't the case and this player is upgrading their lands to play against strangers. It's at this point the player begins to ask questions like "What's the difference between Bracket 2 and Bracket 3? How many upgrades are considered 'too many?'"</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Deserted Temple"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Scorched Ruins"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Rings of Brighthearth"></div></div>
<p>It's here, right here, that their deck has most likely crossed the Bracket barrier. They've started searching for a line to act as a limit they wish to approach but never cross.</p>
<p>A player shifting Brackets can be a definitive moment of development in their <em>Magic</em> experience, but it needs to be recognized as a shift. It'd be detrimental to everyone involved if this player were to start actively optimizing with Cabal or Boseiju or Urza's Saga with victory in mind and try to convince themselves that their deck isn't "that deck."</p>
<p>The lands you run can look as optimized or as janky as you please. Just make sure you're running them for the right reasons.</p>
<h2>Final Thoughts</h2>
<p>To be honest, I don't remember the last time I looked at someone's lands and thought "Man, I should've played another deck." That's what the Commander is for!</p>
<p>It'd be foolish of me to play against strangers, let alone my established play group, and tell them that their deck is too strong or weak because our lands look different.</p>
<p>While most of my decks don't run the most optimized lands for their mana bases, I think it has less to do with me actively trying to power down a deck and is instead due to outside factors such as prices and availability.</p>
<p>Would my <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Szarel, Genesis Shepherd" href="#" target="_blank">Szarel, Genesis Shepherd</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> Bracket 2 deck love the <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Commercial District" href="#" target="_blank">surveil lands</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>? Absolutely. Can I be bothered to drop $30-$40 just to fetch <em>slightly</em> better lands than my <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Sheltered Thicket" href="#" target="_blank">cycling lands</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>? Nope.</p>
<p>In fact, running fewer nonbasics has helped cut down time spent deciding which land is the best land to fetch. The more basics I've started run... the more basic my turns have become...? It forms a pun, therefore it's good!</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">But what do you think? How do you feel about lands being "Bracketed"? What are your thoughts on precons going up against powerful lands? Do you think precons should start including stronger lands?</span></p>
<p>I hope that this article is helpful in discussing why lands ought to be generally unrestricted, but I'd love to hear from you and what your thoughts are. Tune in next time to continue this deep dive in the Bracket system and more <em>Commander Philosophy</em>!</p>
<h3>Read More:</h3>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="G2emUKUqAr"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-sol-ring-isnt-good-for-commander/">Commander Philosophy - Sol Ring Isn't Good For Commander</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;Commander Philosophy - Sol Ring Isn&#039;t Good For Commander&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-sol-ring-isnt-good-for-commander/embed/#?secret=8B7JQYooa5#?secret=G2emUKUqAr" data-secret="G2emUKUqAr" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="8iEymH1iIR"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/what-planetary-annihilation-means-for-commander-precons/">What Planetary Annihilation Means For Commander Precons</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;What Planetary Annihilation Means For Commander Precons&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/what-planetary-annihilation-means-for-commander-precons/embed/#?secret=Od13oXvIKq#?secret=8iEymH1iIR" data-secret="8iEymH1iIR" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="XjVl3ALq88"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/lots-of-new-landfall-toys-where-do-we-go-from-here/">Lots Of New Landfall Toys — Where Do We Go From Here?</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;Lots Of New Landfall Toys — Where Do We Go From Here?&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/lots-of-new-landfall-toys-where-do-we-go-from-here/embed/#?secret=bXxG9Ei3aN#?secret=XjVl3ALq88" data-secret="XjVl3ALq88" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
</div>


When Do Lands Become More Than a Mana Base?

<p style="text-align: right;"><em><span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Central Elevator // Promising Stairs" href="#" target="_blank">Central Elevator // Promising Stairs</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> | Art by <a href="https://cristibalanescu.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Cristi Balanescu</a></em></p>
<h2>Setting Expectations</h2>
<p>How often do you find yourself playing games where decks are ill-matched?</p>
<p>Maybe the deck you brought is stronger than your opponents' decks, and you accidentally stomp the table. Maybe your opponent undersold their Eldrazi deck, and you chose a lower-powered deck based on that expectation. Commander is a complex format with decks that can wildly vary in power level.</p>
<p>Without a pre-game discussion, you might pull out a strong Bracket 4 deck against a player with a slightly upgraded precon and not realize the power difference until halfway into the game. This is a common experience, especially when playing with strangers at your local game store. It can sour any player's mood.</p>
<p>That's why you need an elevator pitch for your Commander decks.</p>
<p>When a player asks what your deck does or how strong it is, how do you reply? Do you mention what bracket level you think it is? Do you just say the theme? How you talk about your deck will set expectations for your opponents and may even be a deciding factor in how they pick their commander.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Edgar Markov"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Bonny Pall, Clearcutter"></div></div>
<p>If you describe your deck as being slow because it's an Eldrazi deck that requires a lot of mana, your opponent might then think their <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Edgar Markov" href="#" target="_blank">Edgar Markov</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> deck is too fast and instead play a <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Bonny Pall, Clearcutter" href="#" target="_blank">Bonny Pall, Clearcutter</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> deck with that expectation.</p>
<p>Using simple descriptors to set power-level expectations might be fine in short-hand, but you hardly told your opponent anything about your deck. Yet they just know it's low-power and plan accordingly. The problem lies in the fact that what constitutes a low-powered deck will vary person to person.</p>
<p>So, when you set the expectation that your deck is low-power and then your deck outperforms the table early in the game, it can be frustrating for those players. You set an expectation for your opponents, and that expectation was broken the moment you popped off on turn four.</p>
<p>The bracket system looks to give everyone common language to use when determining the experience players want to have. It's a good step in the right direction. However, it's only a part of the discussion.</p>
<hr />
<h2>The Bracket System</h2>
<p><img decoding="async" src="https://media.wizards.com/2025/images/daily/en_6Mf3Vbj8q6.jpg" /></p>
<p>Players at my LGS have openly accepted brackets and will mention what bracket their deck is before starting. This has been a huge step forward, given the number of times someone has pulled out a deck without saying anything, or didn't care to discuss power level. Brackets have somewhat narrowed down the conversation, so that if someone says they want to play Bracket 2, we know that means precon-esque power level. If we play Bracket 4, then we know for sure we're playing stronger decks.</p>
<p>And if we say Bracket 3, well...</p>
<p>Bracket 3 feels like the new seven. It's where players who don't understand that their deck is Bracket 4 will say their deck is a high 3. The landscape of Commander hasn't changed, and players still can undervalue their decks. The inclusion of the <a href="https://edhrec.com/top/game-changers" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Game Changers</a> list helps to set a clear line between brackets, but you certainly don't need Game Changers for a deck to be a Bracket 4.</p>
<p>That's the gray area of this system, and leaves it up to the players to self-evaluate their decks.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Cyclonic Rift"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Smothering Tithe"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="The One Ring"></div></div>
<p>Brackets are a step in the right direction when it comes to having a more unified understanding of power level, but the pre-game conversation can't simply be, "My deck is Bracket 3." Adding in more information to let others know what experience you're bringing to the table will go a long way to having more fun games of Commander.</p>
<p>My belief is that decks can hang in pods that are one bracket above or below their intended power level. A Bracket 3 deck should be fine in Bracket 4 pods or Bracket 2 pods. A Bracket 1 deck can be in a pod of Bracket 2 decks, etc. The issue arises when a Bracket 4 deck is played in a pod of Bracket 2 decks, or vice versa.</p>
<p>The power imbalance is more apparent when there's a difference of two brackets in any given scenario. The goal of having an elevator pitch for your deck is to have more effective pre-discussions that creates pods where the power-level differences are only off by one.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Pre-Game Discussions</h2>
<p>Pre-game discussions are important because they allow everyone to weigh in on the type of experience they're looking for.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Jodah, the Unifier"></div></div>
<p>Recently, I played against someone who wanted to pull out his <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Jodah, the Unifier" href="#" target="_blank">Jodah, the Unifier</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> deck after we mentioned wanting a Bracket 3 game. He tried downplaying it, but after two other players at the table said they did not want to play against it, given that Jodah decks are often overwhelming and difficult to play against. So, that player swapped it out for a different deck.</p>
<p>I give this example because a notable commander like Jodah is easier to have expectations for since he's a popular commander that players have probably played against. But so many legends are printed every set, and it's impossible to have thoughts on, let alone experience with, all of these commanders. So, a simple pitch for your deck can help clue players in on what your deck brings to the table.</p>
<p>Think of it as asking players if they wish to play against this deck.</p>
<p>An elevator pitch needs to be simple and concise. It's a way to convey an idea quickly, but also needs to include keywords that players know and can grab onto. Start by mentioning the theme of the deck. Using common terms like "Aristocrat" or "+1/+1 Counters" gets the idea across of what your deck's archetype is.</p>
<p>In addition to this, mentioning the strategy of the deck will go a long way. Is it an aggro deck? Is it a control deck? Is it trying to assemble a combo? Is it a midrange deck that has varying game plans? Understanding the theme and strategy does a lot of heavy lifting because they're ideas that players know and will be able to grasp easily.</p>
<p>After that, mention what the goal of the deck is. Is it trying to win through combat? Are you casting burn spells to scorch the table? Mentioning the goal of your deck will help paint a better picture of what your deck wants to do.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Your Elevator Pitch</h2>
<p>Let's look at a simple formula for what you might say:</p>
<p>"[Commander Name] is my [Theme] deck. It's a [Strategy] deck that wants to accomplish [Goal]. It's Bracket [#]."</p>
<p>Here are some questions that you want to answer. Who is your commander? What theme is your deck? What's the goal of your deck, or how fast is the deck looking to win? What bracket # is your deck? Also, are there notable Game Changers that you should mention, such as extra turn spells or mass land denial?</p>
<p>Here's an example using one of my decks:</p>
<p>"<span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Gonti, Canny Acquisitor" href="#" target="_blank">Gonti, Canny Acquisitor</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is my Rogue deck. It's a theft deck that wants to hit people with evasive Rogues to steal cards, and eventually pump up my Rogues for the win. It's Bracket 3."</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Gonti, Canny Acquisitor"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Slither Blade"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Thieving Skydiver"></div></div>
<p>Let's dissect this example. In the first sentence, I'm answering who my commander is and what the theme is. In the second sentence, I'm answering what style of game plan my deck is and how it tries to win. This is important as some players might want to opt out of playing against a theft deck.</p>
<p>By talking about my deck's playstyle, I'm also giving my opponents the chance to opt out of an experience they don't wish to have. Archetypes like Chaos or Stax will have an effect on the game that players might not be up for.</p>
<p>In this example, Gonti is doing a lot of heavy lifting. My opponents will read what Gonti does and know that it's a theft deck. It helps that Gonti is well-known, as they're the face commander for the <a href="https://edhrec.com/precon/grand-larceny" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Grand Larceny</em> precon</a>. I also mentioned that this is a <a href="https://edhrec.com/tags/rogues" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rogue-themed deck</a>. Gonti isn't necessarily a Rogue commander like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Anowon, the Ruin Thief" href="#" target="_blank">Anowon, the Ruin Thief</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, so I make sure to let people know that it's a typal deck with Rogue synergies.</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Anowon, the Ruin Thief"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Grim Hireling"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Notorious Throng"></div></div>
<p>Rogue Typal isn't a super popular theme, with <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Anowon, the Ruin Thief" href="#" target="_blank">Anowon, the Ruin Thief</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> being the only notable Rogue commander. Unlike <a href="https://edhrec.com/tags/vampires" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Vampires</a> or <a href="https://edhrec.com/tags/dinosaurs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dinosaurs</a>, which are more well-known archetypes, you'll have to explain more about what Rogues can do. Many Rogues are usually small and have evasion in some form, usually through being unblockable or having keywords like flying or shadow.</p>
<p>However, an unblockable 1/1 becomes more threatening when I put down a <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Banner of Kinship" href="#" target="_blank">Banner of Kinship</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> and turn my small creatures into 7/7s. Or when I'm creating six Treasures a turn with <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Grim Hireling" href="#" target="_blank">Grim Hireling</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>When I describe my deck to players, I might have to add that <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Notorious Throng" href="#" target="_blank">Notorious Throng</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is an extra turn spell that I could get back with <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Halo Forager" href="#" target="_blank">Halo Forager</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> or <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Bala Ged Recovery" href="#" target="_blank">Bala Ged Recovery</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>. Or, I could emphasize that this is Bracket 3 and that it can generate a lot of card draw through spells like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Kindred Discovery" href="#" target="_blank">Kindred Discovery</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>While I can't explain all of this in a quick elevator pitch, emphasizing the deck is Bracket 3 will hopefully convey that this is an optimized list that has strong creature synergies.</p>
<p>Here's a link to my deck, <a href="https://archidekt.com/decks/9811771/gontis_rogue_criminal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gonti's Rogue Criminals</a>. Let me know if my pitch accurately describes my deck or if there's room for improvement.</p>
<hr />
<p>Let's look at another example:</p>
<p>"<span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Ognis, the Dragon&#039;s Lash" href="#" target="_blank">Ognis, the Dragon&#039;s Lash</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> is my token deck. It's an aggro deck that uses hasty tokens to generate a lot of Treasure tokens and cast big splashy spells. It's Bracket 2."</p>
<div class="edhrecp__cards"><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Ognis, the Dragon&#039;s Lash"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Urabrask&#039;s Forge"></div><div class="edhrecp__card-container" name="Mob Rule"></div></div>
<p>The goal is to illustrate that this is an aggro deck that wants to make Treasures each turn to cast big spells. Permanents that make haste tokens each turn, like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Urabrask&#039;s Forge" href="#" target="_blank">Urabrask&#039;s Forge</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>, make free attackers that will trigger Ognis. Then, once I've amassed a ton of Treasure tokens, I can cast big X spells like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Song of Totentanz" href="#" target="_blank">Song of Totentanz</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> to create an army of Rats. With a focus on making creature tokens, I can get the most out of drain effects like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Mirkwood Bats" href="#" target="_blank">Mirkwood Bats</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> or <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Nadier&#039;s Nightblade" href="#" target="_blank">Nadier&#039;s Nightblade</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span>.</p>
<p>Finally, with all those Treasure tokens, I can cast big spells like <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Mob Rule" href="#" target="_blank">Mob Rule</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> to swing out at my opponents. Here's a link to my deck, <a href="https://archidekt.com/decks/8074350/ognis_haste" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ognis' Hasty Minions</a>, and let me know if you think my elevator pitch accurately describes this deck.</p>
<p>Your elevator pitch will look different and may contain more or less the same information, but try out this formula if you're not sure where to start.</p>
<p>Your pitch may include why you built your deck. For example, if you're playing a Bracket 1 deck that has a unique build, you might want to talk about why you built the deck in the first place. Also mention if you have a self-imposed deck-building restriction, like Lenny Wooley's gumball decks, where each card can't cost more than 25¢. Or Dana Roach's Ognis deck that's restricted to mono-red. Unique decks often garner interest from other players.</p>
<p>In an episode of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4Y1xYBSaFw&amp;t=1s&amp;ab_channel=CommanderAtHome" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Commander at Home</a>, Ben Brode built a <span class="edhrecp__link"><a class="edhrecp__link-a" content="Thraximundar" href="#" target="_blank">Thraximundar</a><span class="edhrecp__link-image"></span></span> deck using only the tiny cards from the series of small <em>Magic</em> decks that <em>Wizards of the Coast </em>released. And for comedic effect, he used the oversized commander card of Thraximundar. While the premise of the deck is more of a gag than a theme, it's an example of how your reason for building the deck can be part of your pitch.</p>
<p>Commander decks are a form of expression.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Now It's Your Turn</h2>
<p>I would love to see more people take this exercise and use it at their local game stores. Giving your opponents an elevator pitch of your commander deck will encourage pre-game discussions and reduce the odds of games feeling imbalanced.</p>
<p>Being able to describe your deck effectively will not only improve games, but also help you better understand your deck. Maybe it can even help distill what you like about your deck and narrow down its focus.</p>
<p>Let me know your thoughts on this approach to pre-game discussions and if you have any suggestions on how you would improve it. Give me your best elevator pitches for your decks in the comments down below, and I'll see you next time!</p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="WMb050AVIr"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-game-winners-vs-game-changers/">Commander Philosophy - Game Winners vs. Game Changers</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;Commander Philosophy - Game Winners vs. Game Changers&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-game-winners-vs-game-changers/embed/#?secret=etl7Jga218#?secret=WMb050AVIr" data-secret="WMb050AVIr" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="40gnz8zUOY"><p><a href="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-the-difference-between-synergy-and-exploiting/">Commander Philosophy - The Difference Between Synergy and Exploiting</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden;" title="&#8220;Commander Philosophy - The Difference Between Synergy and Exploiting&#8221; &#8212; EDHREC" src="https://edhrec.com/articles/commander-philosophy-the-difference-between-synergy-and-exploiting/embed/#?secret=j3uM8usnpr#?secret=40gnz8zUOY" data-secret="40gnz8zUOY" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>


commander brackets bracket system

When Do Lands Become More Than a Mana Base?

Why You Should Have an Elevator Pitch for Your Commander Decks