The Doctor is In

Welcome back to the doctor's office! Before we get to this week's patient, I want to extend another thank you to everyone who has sent in decks since my previous article, I often get very good submissions, but the ones sent in now have been delivered by prospective patients who have clearly read and taken my advice to heart. Well done, all of you!

One of these submitters is Kyle, and we're going to take a look at his brew this week. Kyle has not only sent me a well-written submission of his deck (detailing what it tries to do, how it tries to win, and what ails it), but his brew is also very unique: it's a five-color enchantment deck featuring a DonateDonate-style package with a "hidden commander" in Zedruu, the GreatheartedZedruu, the Greathearted.

Before we get into the list, I want to expand upon the deck's theme in general and on "hidden commanders" in particular.

Hidden Commanders in EDH

I'm going to be perfectly upfront about this matter: I am not a fan of running decks with hidden commanders. For the uninitiated, this essentially means that while your deck has a formal commander (almost always a five-color one), it has another card within the 99 that is its "true" commander which the deck is really built around. The deck has the other, official commander just to unlock all the colors.

While there is nothing wrong with building a deck around a particular card that happens to not be able to be your commander, say Wild ResearchWild Research for example, there is just something that feels wrong to me to build, for example, a traditional Nekusar, the MindrazerNekusar, the Mindrazer deck and just throw Child of AlaraChild of Alara into the command zone to get access to the green ramp spells.

To me, the art of building around a commander that has a few drawbacks can be highly rewarding. As Mark Rosewater often says, "restriciton breeds creativity," and even if a commander happens to not be in the exact right colors for what you have in mind, the deck can still turn out excellent. As an example, a good friend of mine has for a long time played an Esper-colored "lands matter" deck using none other than Dakkon BlackbladeDakkon Blackblade himself as commander! Personally, I would much rather play a deck around its commander, building to its strengths and trying to overcome any drawbacks, rather than chuck a five-color legendary creature into the command zone and load up on tutors to get the "real" commander out of the 99 when needed. To each their own, though.

All of this aside, Kyle's brew is a very spicy one and it's not exactly guilty of the sins detailed above, since it's essentially doing two things at the same time: the deck is both an enchantress deck and a Zedruu the GreatheartedZedruu the Greathearted deck at the same time. Kyle writes, however, that he is thinking about cutting the DonateDonate part of the deck, which I won't do in this analysis. The thought of Zedruu the GreatheartedZedruu the Greathearted giving away a Demonic PactDemonic Pact is just too hilarious for me. Another issue with the deck, Kyle writes, is that it has issues finishing a game, and we'll try to do something about that too.

The Patient

Aside from the cards already discussed, we've got Nylea's ColossusNylea's Colossus to finish off opponents in no time. With it on board, all it takes is three enchantments cast in the same turn for it to one-shot anyone who hasn't gained life during the game, and this is very doable. Granted, it doesn't have any form of evasion, so it takes careful play, but following up a board wipe with Colossus in the late game might just take someone out. Crysal ChimesCrysal Chimes is expensive mana-wise, but enables this type of play further, and also allows us to reuse enchantments that have been destroyed. Supreme VerdictSupreme Verdict is, in my opinion, a straight upgrade to In Garruk's WakeIn Garruk's Wake in this deck, less than half the total mana cost, and since we're not running many creatures, the effects are more or less the same. Estrid's InvocationEstrid's Invocation is a straight upgrade to Copy EnchantmentCopy Enchantment, since we'll only really want to copy our own enchantments anyway, and in my opinion, no decks that could play them should go without Swords to PlowsharesSwords to Plowshares and Fact or FictionFact or Fiction.

As for the other cuts, they were quite diffucult to make, but as stated before, I've elected to axe some of the pillowfort cards - PropagandaPropaganda and Mogis, God of SlaughterMogis, God of Slaughter most notably, but keeping Ghostly PrisonGhostly Prison since we might need the effect, but not the redundancy. Form of the DragonForm of the Dragon is a cool card if it can be donated immediately, but if someone were to, for example, remove Zedruu the GreatheartedZedruu the Greathearted in response to us casting the enchantment, we're in big trouble. Similarly, Nefarious LichNefarious Lich is too high-risk in my opinion, while Grave BetrayalGrave Betrayal is doubtless a very powerful card, but it's also expensive to cast and we don't have many ways to activate it. Lastly, the alternative win conditions of Test of EnduranceTest of Endurance and TriskaidekaphobiaTriskaidekaphobia are cute, but too difficult to activate.

The Final Iteration

The changes leaves us with this decklist:

Link to the deck on deckstats: Click!

I'm therefore discharging the patient with the hope that it will recover completely from my surgery, and end up a stronger, more offensive deck that can close out and win games it's in control of.

Did I miss out on any cards? What cards would you consider for the deck yourself? Leave a comment below, and help Kyle with his deck!

Do You Want Your Deck Featured Here?

General Medicine is a bi-weekly column where I take a look at your EDH deck, run it through our own EDHREC analysis, add some twists and turns of my own, and present your deck with an analysis for the world to see, right here on this site! Sound exciting? Want your sweet brew featured (as in, picked apart, analyzed, and written about – it’s not as scary as it might sound!) in my series?

Here’s what you do:

• Send an e-mail to [email protected] and make sure you include the following:
• An easy to read decklist. Links to the usual suspects (TappedOut, Deckstats, etc.) are fine.
• A short description of your deck – how does it play? How does it win? What are your favorite cards?
• A short description of where you want to go with the deck – is it competitive? 75%? Casual? Are there any budgetary restrictions in play?
• If needed, a short description of your local metagame – are there any decks you’re looking to beat?
• Sign it with your name, but let me know if you want to remain anonymous or use an alias.
• Hold on to your Krark’s Thumb and hope that I will choose your deck!
• So far the response have been awesome and I’ve been getting a lot of submissions. If your deck isn’t featured in the very next article, fear not, it’s still in my log and I might get to it into the future!
• If your deck is selected, I will be keeping a copy of your deck as well as my take on it on my EDHREC deckstats profile. Let me know in your submission if you want to opt out of this practice!

I am not using some sort of first-come, first-served policy, I am choosing the most interesting deck, and I am also looking at the best write-ups! Make sure you read the submission guidelines above, and take your time when writing me your e-mail; the better the write-up, the higher the chance I pick your deck! And if you’re not picked next time, fear not – I will be keeping any unused lists and write-ups in my log, from which I will pull the nuggets every other week.